Timeline for Does a mountain top have higher gravity than a nearby sea-level surface?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2021 at 23:25 | comment | added | george storm | PS You probably deduced that I am accustomed to stating units only where they are not already implied. I now appreciate that this is not appropriate here, | |
| Jan 14, 2021 at 23:25 | history | edited | george storm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 54 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2021 at 23:10 | history | edited | george storm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2021 at 23:08 | comment | added | george storm | Thank you both for your assistance - I'm new to Latex. I've left the units for rate-of-change of gravity as acceleration-change per unit height rather than cancelling - I hope this makes things clearer. Please let me know if anything more needs clarification. Thanks again | |
| Jan 14, 2021 at 23:02 | history | edited | george storm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
formatting and units
|
| Jan 14, 2021 at 8:32 | comment | added | JeopardyTempest | Perhaps $\frac{3 \rho G}{\frac{4}{3}\pi}$? is the unresolved formula, not sure. | |
| S Jan 14, 2021 at 8:28 | history | suggested | peterh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
link, partial latexification
|
| Jan 13, 2021 at 21:41 | comment | added | peterh |
Welcome on the ES SE! We have quite good latex support here, type in $\frac{4\pi}{3}$ and you will get $\frac{4\pi}{3}$. I could not understand some of your formulas at the middle of your answer, I only partially latexified them. Please fix them, they absolutely do not look well, not in dimensionality and not numerically.
|
|
| Jan 13, 2021 at 21:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 14, 2021 at 8:28 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2021 at 18:20 | review | Late answers | |||
| Jan 13, 2021 at 21:41 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2021 at 18:06 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 14, 2021 at 0:14 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2021 at 18:04 | history | answered | george storm | CC BY-SA 4.0 |