Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 13, 2023 at 22:57 answer added Ken Fabian timeline score: 0
May 4, 2023 at 17:43 comment converted from answer rocky I have designed fracture stimulation treatments for 31 years and been involved in many very complex by nature jobs with data acquisition analysis from microseismic evaluation that I can say fracing has nothing to do with anything regarding heat transfer from the earths core! Every single description of fracking here is so off track it needs to be disregarded!
Jun 25, 2022 at 7:01 answer added Richard Kennedy timeline score: -3
Nov 17, 2021 at 21:27 comment added Ken Fabian To be an important variable it needs to be shown it is varying; it is not ignored or neglected - just known to be both relatively small in total amounts of heat flow and known that the rate of heat flow hasn't been increasing. And a whole lot of valid science would have to be ignored or neglected or overturned for the causes of global warming to still be considered an unexplained mystery.
Aug 24, 2021 at 3:31 answer added Keith McClary timeline score: 3
Aug 23, 2021 at 11:36 answer added Ed Doddridge timeline score: 8
Aug 23, 2021 at 5:54 history edited Fred CC BY-SA 4.0
Grammatical changes
Aug 22, 2021 at 21:40 comment added Keith McClary @Jean-MariePrival It also does not change much in time, so it can be neglected in climate change calculations. I could not find an estimate of how many degrees warmer it makes the surface. Saturn is 32C warmer due to internal energy flux!
Aug 22, 2021 at 20:57 comment added Jean-Marie Prival The internal heat flux is, on average, about 0.1 W/m$^2$, while the incoming solar radiation is about 340 W/m$^2$. So internal heat is not an important variable for climate models. See for example this answer: earthscience.stackexchange.com/a/431/18081
Aug 22, 2021 at 18:31 review First posts
Aug 23, 2021 at 5:54
Aug 22, 2021 at 18:26 history asked Natural Number Guy CC BY-SA 4.0