Is carbon lost from topsoil when it's degraded/removed? What is the scientific process?

  • $\begingroup$ The scientific process? Do you mean how scientists deal with this question and work in the field with measuring CO2 fluxes? $\endgroup$ – daniel.neumann Sep 11 '17 at 8:20
  • $\begingroup$ Too short to be an answer: Oxidation. $\endgroup$ – David Hammen Sep 11 '17 at 9:11
  • $\begingroup$ You also need to specify the form of carbon you mean. Pure carbon, e.g. charcoal from fires, is pretty stable (from my own observations). Carbon incorporated in organic materials - say the stuff I add to my compost pile - is eaten by various organisms, such as worms & bacteria. $\endgroup$ – jamesqf Sep 11 '17 at 18:00

There are two ways carbon is released from soil.

The first is cellular respiration of plants that uses previously stored energy (visualized in this chart).

The second is when heterotrophs consume organic carbon below ground and respire carbon dioxide.

The sum of these is called soil respiration, which I think was the process you were asking about.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By the scientific process, I guess I was thinking what is meant by carbon is 'lost' when topsoils are altered significantly and why farmers try to 'trap' carbon to maintain fertility? I obviously have some science gaps of knowledge here. $\endgroup$ – Ronald Jees Sep 12 '17 at 10:41

Soil loses net carbon when disturbance stops carbon fixation but does not stop carbon respiration.

Carbon is fixed into organic material by photosynthesis, mostly by plants; carbon respiration is when organic material rots or is eaten, as described by communitys. Undisturbed soils have fluxes of carbon both in and out almost all the time.

Most human disturbances reduce photosynthesis, so "disturbed soils release carbon" is an adequate shorthand. For instance, plow agriculture that keeps soil bare of plants for a significant part of the year; or moving piles of soil around for construction, or diverting streams and groundwater so that plants die of drought, or simply paving over soil. Natural disturbances can do the same.

As ecosystems mature on undisturbed soil, they tend to become more efficient at capturing energy and retaining limiting nutrients and therefore gain biomass, including soil organic material (SOM). SOM not only literally contains nutrients, but is a micro-environment that buffers nutrients, buffers water, and supports microbes that help plant roots flourish, which is why agriculture benefits from increased SOM.

Even in wild environments, leaching eventually reduces the soluble nutrients and reduces total biomass (see Vitousek & Reiners, 1975, and a lot of Vitousek's later work). The leaching takes long enough that it's also an adequate shorthand to say that undisturbed soils will accumulate soil carbon.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.