This tweet from Brian McNoldy includes a graph suggesting that tropical cyclones are typically getting named earlier in the year in the Atlantic:

TC earliest name

What are the causes for this?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think the tweet contains part of the answer. You need to see how the SSTs have changed in the past forty years. Is there a regional increase in the SSTs significantly over the Atlantic ? $\endgroup$ – gansub May 26 '18 at 8:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Always? Can you provide any related graph for pacific. ENSO may alter a bit more than south atlantic equivalent the starting date of hurricane season. $\endgroup$ – user12525 May 26 '18 at 11:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JeopardyTempest - Universal_learner has a point. Can you separate the graph into La Nina years and El Nino years or at least filter out the El Nino years? Looks like that graph will really tell us a lot. $\endgroup$ – gansub May 26 '18 at 11:25
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Universal_learner Sorry, indeed abbreviations like that would be hard to translate. EPAC = Eastern Pacific. We have thorough datasets easily available for the Atlantic and Eastern Pacific, but his graph was only about the Atlantic. I will make a separate graph for the Eastern Pacific region, and look into ENSO criteria, because yes I do agree that that will reveal more about the pattern and possible causes. I'd say my answer, while long, is more a lot of statistical comparisons than really in depth technical meteorology. But can understand it's tough. I will try to clean up language/acronyms. $\endgroup$ – JeopardyTempest May 27 '18 at 0:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ you can do nice things with new technologies and data. thanks for posting and I will read the discusion of the post, but I cannot contribute a lot on the debate far away from mmm maybe enso alter this a bit $\endgroup$ – user12525 May 27 '18 at 0:56

The shift appears to match up to a large change in the number of cyclones that peak as tropical storms in the early part of the TC season (here defined as March-July), shown by the blue (tropical storms) versus purple (hurricanes) in this graph (made using the HURDAT2 dataset from NHC):

enter image description here

It appears that a large part of the increase in tropical storms lines up with a coincident decrease in tropical depressions (shown in green).
It's notable that tropical depressions only start appearing in the dataset starting in 1963. I don't know it for a fact, but because the timing lines up with the advent of satellite weather data it suggests TDs may have been added once satellite offered a better picture to find and analyze weaker systems.
Therefore, it would seem one possible theory might be that there was an initial predilection to hold less organized systems at tropical depression status, but as data has increased from hurricane hunters, satellite resolution upgrades, and additional/more rapid data reports, more of these systems were progressively graded as tropical storms.

Looking into the data at full resolution, it appears the trend may be greatest in weak and moderate tropical storms (focus on the lesser change in dark blue colors, and in most of the pink bands):

enter image description here

Does this pattern also match the rest of the year?

I'd suggest yes and no. Here's the corresponding graph for the late parts of the season:

enter image description here

So it looks like:

  • Tropical storms are still on the upswing in the late season, just not nearly as much (the trend line for early season goes from 0.5 to 2.5, for late season it goes from 1 to 2).
  • Cyclones maxing as tropical depressions have also sharply dropped away in the late season, closely matching the early season pattern (indeed, late season TDs were less to start with, in parallel with the smaller TS increase).
  • Also note that the number of hurricanes themselves have increased in the late season by over 50% (while remaining fairly constant in the early season).

You can look into the trends in each storm type in the following set of graphs:

TD/TS/HUR 50 years: early, mid, late, total
TS/HUR 100 years: early, mid, late, total
By strength full history: early, mid, late, total

(Note these analyses don't include 19 unnamed TCs in 1967-69 where no intensity is given in HURDAT)

Many certainly do propose climate change as a possible mechanism to shift the intensity and numbers of TCs. Quite a few warming modeling studies have suggested there would be an increase in tropical storms. It appears that this paper (Kunkel et al 2009) has some interesting discussion into the topic in the hurricanes and typhoons section. The conclusion of:

In summary, robust detection of trends in Atlantic and western North Pacific TC activity is significantly constrained by data heterogeneity and deficient quantification of internal variability. Attribution of past TC changes is further challenged by a lack of consensus on the physical linkages between climate forcing and TC activity. As a result, attribution of any observed trends in TC activity in these basins to anthropogenic forcing remains controversial.

seems to offer a fair reflection of the overall situation as of now in tropical cyclones and possible connections to climate change. There's certainly plenty of debate over how significantly climate change is influencing the shifts seen; some will draw more conclusions than others.

Regardless of whether it's due to changes in identification practices or other causes like human climate change, it's clear there are more named systems in the early season, and that would certainly often result in an earlier first name.

On the other hand, is it due particularly to sufficient ocean temperatures existing earlier in the season over wider areas? It would seem odd that such a change would mostly impact only the number of tropical storms, and not change the number of hurricanes. But further analysis should certainly be done and the other MPI factors.

I do offer one final small postulate, based both upon these graphs and upon my own perceptions... perhaps at least a small part of the upswing in tropical storms might be due to an increase in the buzz at the start of each new year. It seems there is more and more talk and "excitement" and interviews as each year get started. And I wonder if that may prime forecasters to make earlier designations sometimes.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If storms are starting earlier in the season then I would think of mid latitude influences i.e. PV anomalies etc. I mean PV anomalies creating tropical depressions. $\endgroup$ – gansub May 26 '18 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ (Also note that these graphs only include the time that a system is within the given months. So for example a hurricane like Georges in 1998 will show up in the late (Oct-Feb) set as only a 25 kt max TD as that was its peak within that period. I took a quick look to see if the trends might be a fluke of storm timing changes around the cutoffs, but it doesn't appear likely. $\endgroup$ – JeopardyTempest May 26 '18 at 15:02
  • $\begingroup$ @gansub good thinking, yeah, that makes sense... so maybe the looks should be at PV/extratropical mechanisms rather than SSTs, given SSTs are more often marginal in development within the bookends of the season anyways. $\endgroup$ – JeopardyTempest May 26 '18 at 15:05
  • $\begingroup$ So sea surface temperature influence is marginal in relation with other factors as potential vorticity? $\endgroup$ – user12525 May 28 '18 at 10:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Universal_learner I'd say it's always about of contributing factors in total, sometimes more of one, sometimes more of another. As a whole sea surface temperatures are very important. But in early season/late season storms, I'm suggesting (in the Atlantic at least) that vorticity often may prove core to the development... but gansub might offer more/better thoughts. $\endgroup$ – JeopardyTempest May 28 '18 at 23:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.