Wikipedia names thermal monitoring as one of the methods for predicting volcanic eruptions. I was able to find some papers (First, Second) on such thermometry and while they are challenging (I retired from physics years ago), I will consult them for the methods.

What I completely fail to find information on, is how current thermal behavior is supposed to be linked to future eruptions (other than: "it’s getting hotter, that could be magma rising upwards"). I realize we don’t have complete theories, but I hope you can tell me what kinds of ansatzes there are.


migrated from physics.stackexchange.com Jul 11 '18 at 18:07

This question came from our site for active researchers, academics and students of physics.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The Earth Science might be of more help. $\endgroup$ – Jon Custer Jul 11 '18 at 15:34
  • $\begingroup$ @JonCuster didn’t know that existed! Should I join and repost? I think there is a move feature. $\endgroup$ – Ludi Jul 11 '18 at 15:38
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ As far as I know, once a melt makes its way into a magma chamber, volatile content is the dominant eruptive trigger. Volatiles generally trigger eruptions in one of two ways. As a magma ascends, the decrease in pressure lowers the solubility of dissolved volatiles in the melt which creates bubbles. Alternatively there can be so-called "phreatomagmatic eruptions" which occur when ascending magma reacts with groundwater. At first glance, this makes me think that thermal monitoring may not be the best method for predicting eruptions. It's an interesting question - I'll ask around and report back $\endgroup$ – g.z. Jul 14 '18 at 0:32

I have not heard of complete theories connecting volcano temperatures to eruption possibilities either. If you mean subsurface magma temperatures, it is uncommon for there to be direct observations / readings for a particular volcano. Fumarolic temperatures, on the other hand, are directly indicative of current volcanic activity and are much more easily measured (example). In addition, geochemical analysis of fumarolic gases can be related to eruption probability (example, example).

Even in models of magma ascent, temperature differences are not the main focus, but rather pressure differences are (example). This is directly related to g.z.'s comment that volatile content certainly can be a dominant eruptive trigger.

  • $\begingroup$ I am a complete layman. What are fumarolic temperatures? $\endgroup$ – Ludi Jul 14 '18 at 17:31
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Ludi Fumaroles are holes that spew out volcanic gases (sulfur is a common one). $\endgroup$ – g.z. Jul 16 '18 at 2:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.