NASA recently landed a seismometer on Mars, with what sounds an impressive detection ability, with press reports gushing it is "able to detect vibrations smaller than a hydrogen atom." A more technical description is

SEIS [...] is capable of measuring accelerations down to $10^{-9} m/s^2/\sqrt{Hz}$ over frequencies of 0.001 to 10 Hz and $5 \times 10^{-8} m/s^2/\sqrt{Hz}$ from 0.01 to 100 Hz

-- which still seems pretty impressive. How does this compare to typical terrestrial equipment?

  • $\begingroup$ these are not typical seismometers so they don't count; 1, 2 $\endgroup$
    – uhoh
    Feb 9 '19 at 5:25

The table below gives you a nice summary snapshot up to 2015.

enter image description here

Reference: Kamp, P.J., 2016. Towards an Ultra Sensitive Seismic Accelerometer (Master's thesis, University of Twente).

Sercel accelerometer, the top one in the table, is widely used in Oil and Gas industry, for example, to monitor induced seismicity. Below is an excerpt from the article: "A high-sensitivity MEMS-based accelerometer", by J. Laine and D. Mougenot (2014), The Leading Edge, 33(11).

1 g is about ~10 m/s^2 (9.80665) so 1 ng ~ 10^-8 m/s^2. For the Sercel then 360 ng mentioned in the paper (three times the rms noise level) = 3.6 ^10-6 m/s^2.

Correct me if I am wrong.

enter image description here

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ it would be nice to transform those values in ng to m/s² so they can be directly compared with the values given for SEIS $\endgroup$ Feb 8 '19 at 18:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ 1 g is about ~10 m/s^2 (9.80665) so 1 ng ~ 10^-8 m/s^2. I will add the conversion for the MEMS to my answer $\endgroup$
    – MyCarta
    Feb 8 '19 at 20:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.