The more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere the more global warming. The more global warming the more cloud formations that cool the earth and clean the air from carbon dioxid when rain- and snowfall, in a very longtime perspective.
Sooner or later the cloud formations will reach a point of equilibrium when global warming cease in a state of much more clouds, much more and stronger storms. When global cooling and decrease of carbon dioxide, the glaciation will increase the albedo and support the global cooling with amplifying feedback, as atmospheric carbon dioxid support global warming with amplifying feedback.
This seems to be in accordance with the historical peaks of temperature anomalies and carbon dioxide rates. The question is, does this mechanism works in the industrial era? Will the storms, if necessary, stop the extra emissions of carbon dioxide? If human being isn't able to cut it down?
I can't change the question as that may make answers inadequate, but I will formulate your criticism under the line, eventually.
Simulations doesn't attests that clouds in general have a netto cooling effect.
Rain and snow doesn't transport a significant amount of $\mathbf{CO_2}$ from the atmosphere to the ground in a short term perspective.
The prediction doesn't refer to the equilibrium $\mathbf{CO_2+H_2O}\rightleftharpoons\mathbf{H_2CO_3}$ in the oceans.
The prediction doesn't refer to the effect of $\mathbf{CO_2}$ on formation of clouds or it's influence of the cooling effect of clouds.
The prediction doesn't refer to water vapor as a greenhouse gas and that clouds are condensed vapor.
The prediction doesn't refer to different types of clouds.