I've been doing some wikipedia binging and it's come to my realization that it may be in the Earth's best interest to raise the world oyster population as quickly as possible. The basis for this is for several reasons:

[They hold] promise for relieving pressure on land-based protein sources.


[They] provide shoreline protection and sediment stabilization, nutrient cycling and sequestration, and habitat for other organisms.

and most importantly:

sources state that a single oyster can filter 24–96 liters a day (1–4 liters per hour). With 750,000 oysters in one acre, 18,000,000-72,000,000 liters of water can be filtered, removing most forms of particulate matter suspended in the water column. (Source)

What I'm curious about, however, is the potential downstream impacts of the overpopulation of oysters. They seem to have so many ecological benefits, I'd like to see if there's a hard detriment to everyone breeding thousands of oysters in their free time to help the ocean.

What I'm particularly concerned about is other filter feeders that may become threatened by a strong prevalence of the oyster population.

To summarize my question; is this a reasonable solution, and what potential risks exist should the world try to greatly increase the oyster populations where they exist currently already?

As @Fred pointed out in the comments, precautions would/should be taken to ensure endemic oysters are used to be as minimally invasive as possible, and responsibly bred for biodiversity to prevent viral catastrophe.

  • $\begingroup$ this is definitly not the solution,we have a massive invasion of pacific oysters in the north of europe and this is at the same time as the population of the atlantic blue mussel population are colapsing,i am not saying the two are connected but they might be. $\endgroup$ – trond hansen Jun 18 at 16:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If it were to be done I would advise using oysters endemic to the area where they would be used, to prevent imported oysters becoming an ecological threat/disaster. Be prepared for the oysters to be wiped out by viruses & other pathogens - it happens in other forms of intensive aquaculture. One problem I see is what happens to the oysters that have absorbed seaborne contaminants; how are they destroyed or processed so the contaminants aren't re-released into the environment again? $\endgroup$ – Fred Jun 18 at 16:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is a project in NYC to try to restore oysters. Goal is 1 billion oysters by 2035 and 100 acres of reefs. It is estimated that pre-Columbian NY harbor hosted 220,000 acres of oyster reefs! billionoysterproject.org $\endgroup$ – AllInOne Jun 18 at 19:42
  • $\begingroup$ You would need a massive amount of farms to even reach pre-industrial shellfish levels much less have further impact. $\endgroup$ – John Jun 18 at 19:47
  • $\begingroup$ @AllInOne can you please post that as an answer? That seems like exactly what I was looking for! $\endgroup$ – Erin B Jun 18 at 19:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.