3
$\begingroup$

I am trying to initialize my model with the cloud liquid water data from ERA5. My model IITM-ESM which evolved from CFSv2 takes in the cloud liquid water information in $\small\mathsf{kg/m^2}$. However the ERA5 specific cloud liquid water data is in kg/kg. I have the following questions

  1. Am I right in trying to derive cloud liquid water in $\small\mathsf{kg/m^2}$ for specific cloud liquid water in kg/kg
  2. How do I go about this ? I found a way to convert kg/kg cloud liquid water content to $\small\mathsf{g/m^3}$ in the link https://www.nwpsaf.eu/site/download/documentation/rtm/docs_rttov12/rttov_gas_cloud_aerosol_units.pdf After getting the cloud liquid water in $\small\mathsf{g/m^3}$, will multiplying by layer thickness (data is 3D with lat, lon, levels and the level information is in pressure levels i.e. Pascals) and $\small\mathsf{10^{-3}}$ be okay to convert it to $\small\mathsf{kg/m^2}$
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

I got the solution https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_to_convert_the_units_of_specific_cloud_liquid_water_from_ERA5_kg_kg_to_kg_m2

and

https://www.nwpsaf.eu/site/download/documentation/rtm/docs_rttov12/rttov_gas_cloud_aerosol_units.pdf

In the above link the conversions between $\small\mathsf{kg/kg}$ , $\small\mathsf{g/m^3}$ , $\small\mathsf{kg/m^2}$ can be explicitly derived

EDIT The summary of the first hyperlink is:

$\small\mathsf{kg/kg}$ stands usually for kg liquid water per kg air. Multiplying the term with the calculated air density within the field will result into $\small\mathsf{kg/m^3}$, which means kg liquid water per $\small\mathsf{m^3}$ air. Then you have to multiply with the thickness of the liquid cloud, which will result into $\small\mathsf{kg/m^2}$."

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The stuff behind a hyperlink has a bad tendency to just vanish. Please put a summary of the method in your answer itself. $\endgroup$ – Spencer Dec 5 '19 at 13:19
  • $\begingroup$ @Spencer I have added the summary $\endgroup$ – Manmeet Singh Dec 5 '19 at 13:38
  • $\begingroup$ OK; I made a little edit to better fit SE formatting conventions. $\endgroup$ – Spencer Dec 5 '19 at 17:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.