1
$\begingroup$

In 1970, the USSR began drilling at the Kola Super-deep Borehole. The target depth was 15,000 meters;

The stated areas of study were the deep structure of the Baltic Shield, seismic discontinuities and the thermal regime in the Earth's crust, the physical and chemical composition of the deep crust and the transition from upper to lower crust, lithospheric geophysics, and to create and develop technologies for deep geophysical study,

according to its Wikipedia entry.

Data obtained from previous seismic experiments had been interpreted to indicate a transition, which was supposed to be from granite above to basalt below about 7,000 meters. However, one of the surprising findings of the experiment was that there was no such change of kind of rock; the difference was metamorphic, now said to be a result of the changing pressure. Also,

...the rock at that depth had been thoroughly fractured and was saturated with water, which was surprising. This water, unlike surface water, must have come from deep-crust minerals and had been unable to reach the surface because of a layer of impermeable rock.

The source for this entry is Allen Bellows at damninteresting.com (which coincidentally places the supposed granite-basalt transition at "3-6 km"):

Because free water should not be found at those depths, scientists theorize that the water is comprised of hydrogen and oxygen atoms which were squeezed out of the surrounding rocks due to the incredible pressure.

So, why should water not be found at those depths? Based on what assumptions were people surprised to find water there? Or was it only journalists who were surprised?

I'm sorry I don't have more initial research; the truth is I don't know where to start looking. Online searches only give me results like this article at Science Magazine, which is related only because in its case, too, water is supposed to be "squeezed out" of rock, synthesized, as it were from its chemical components. (I asked this question at Codidact.physics, but it seems to need the broader context of geology)

Related: What do continents "lay" on?

New contributor
Conrado is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
6
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is , in oil and gas provinces . I can't say it is connate or in solution with hydrocarbons , but it causes corrosion problems. Search SPE references for HPHT wells ( high pressure, high temperature ). Of course the Kola well was based on oilwell techniques and equipment. $\endgroup$ – blacksmith37 Apr 7 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ A recent paper (discussed and linked here) says that the mantle is absorbing water as it cools. $\endgroup$ – Keith McClary Apr 7 at 20:14
  • $\begingroup$ Well to start with because the rock was 180 degrees C, well above the boiling point of water. $\endgroup$ – John 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ @john Yes, the boiling point at sea level. But it's not the same at other pressures, is it? $\endgroup$ – Conrado 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ @Conrado it does change but it does not change that much with just a few kilometers. $\endgroup$ – John yesterday

Your Answer

Conrado is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.