6
$\begingroup$

The Ring of Fire goes through the places that have the most earthquakes. Why is the Ring of Fire there, not somewhere else?

ring of fire

Any help would be appreciated!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Just to clarify, you are asking why the ring of fire surrounds the pacific ocean and not why the ring of fire has high volcanic and seismic activity? $\endgroup$ – Neo Jun 13 '14 at 4:24
  • $\begingroup$ Exactly! That's what I mean. $\endgroup$ – ʇolɐǝz ǝɥʇ qoq Jun 13 '14 at 4:25
8
$\begingroup$

This question is very similar to: Why does the "Ring of Fire" pretty much define "Pacific Rim"

The high levels of volcanoes and earthquakes are primarily due to subduction. So why is the Pacific surrounded by subduction zones?

Think back to Pangaea. This was a supercontinent that formed in the late Palaeozoic. Virtually all of the Earth's land masses were concentrated in one large supercontinent. When this broke up, the new continents moved away from each other. Fast forward 200Ma or so, and you find that the continents have moved so far apart that they are now converging on a point on the other side of the planet - the continents are moving towards each other! Hence the remains of the super ocean (which was actually multiple ocean plates - today's Pacific & Nazca plates, plus the Farrallon plate (RIP),etc ) is shrinking as the continental plates move towards it. This destruction of the ocean plate(s) occurs at subduction zones.

This is a big picture generalisation. Not all of the Pacific's boundaries are marked with subduction zones (e.g. North America has two large strike slip systems + a new spreading ridge). Also, not all of the continents are converging on each other. Africa is doing a pirouette, India is moving northwards, etc.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.