5
$\begingroup$

So the moon is full of helium-3.

Since it's a gas in the moon's vacuum... Why doesn't it escape?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Can you provide a reference for your claim? $\endgroup$ – casey Jun 26 '14 at 22:59
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ InquilineKea is not in the habit of putting a lot of effort into questions. Rather, of putting a little effort into lot of questions. $\endgroup$ – naught101 Jul 9 '14 at 13:42
11
$\begingroup$

The Moon is not "full" of helium-3. 3He is at most fifty parts per billion of the lunar regolith1 and that "high" concentration pertains only to permanently shadowed craters. The Moon is bombarded by a steady stream of helium-3 while sunlit. Some of this incoming helium-3 is temporarily embedded in the lunar regolith. Without this steady supply, the helium-3 content would dissipate at a temperature-dependent rate proportional to the amount of helium-3 in the lunar regolith.

The quantity $q(t)$ of in a cubic meter of lunar regolith is thus dictated by a simple differential equation, $\dot q(t) = \alpha(t) - \beta(T)q(t)$. Time averaging the bombardment and escape rates yields $\dot {\bar q}(t) = \bar{\alpha} - \beta(\bar T)q(t)$. This differential equation yields a steady state value of $\bar q = \bar{\alpha}/\beta(\bar T)$.


1 Cooks, "3He in permanently shadowed lunar polar surfaces", Icarus, 206:2 778-779 (2010).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.