3
$\begingroup$

Is there any recommended method for finding the optimum number and location of rain gauges over a region based on the data from existing rain gauges. There is one Isohyetal method that does not give the exact location.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ You might want to investigate the potential for using geostatistics (the theory of regionalized variables). See this $\endgroup$
    – Fred
    Jun 14 at 16:30
2
$\begingroup$

The answer, as is often the case for questions about optimums, depends on objectives and constraints.

  1. How accurately do you want to measure rainfall? The more gauges the more precision, but obviously at greater cost.

  2. How important is the spatial element, which in turn might depend on the objectives of monitoring? Is it more important to get accurate total volumes, or to identify variability and extremes?

Imagine two cases in the same region, with a hilly area, a hydroelectric dam and an agricultural lowland. The dam operators would want to accurately characterize inflow to their dam, while the farmers might want to measure dry season rainfall to schedule irrigation. A third agency might be satisfied with a single gauge that most closely represented a regional average. Their definitions of optimum would be rather different.

With objectives determined the next question is where do you get data on existing rainfall and variability? Often it's the case that these questions of optimization are about rationalizing or refining existing networks. In this case you will have records from the existing network.

While the detailed approach may vary, the basic principal is to compare the contribution, in terms of information, of each rain gauge to your quantitative objective. You can then eliminate the gauge that contributes the least information. This process can be repeated until a minimum network that meets the project objective is arrived at. Computationally refining this method to look at all possible combinations of subsamples is usual. I.e. for a 10 gauge network you would look at all combinations of 9 gauges, then of 8 etc. until the objectives were met.

A similar approach can be used to add gauges to a network, by looking at the correlations between adjacent rain gauges and siting gauges in areas of poor spatial correlation.

«A New Approach for Optimizing Rain Gauge Networks: A Case Study in the Jinjiang Basin» by Wu et al. is a good worked example of this process using geostatistics. Its reference list provides links to many other case studies.

Reference:

Wu, H.; Chen, Y.; Chen, X.; Liu, M.; Gao, L.; Deng, H. Water 2020, 12, 2252; (https://doi.org/10.3390/w12082252, open access).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Rainfall varies according to a lot of different factors, which include the location of mountains and hills, bodies of water, and vegetation.

One approach is to collect data interactively with the environment. To do that keep placing rain gauges. If they are reading the same, separate them. So, by trial and error you determine a good distribution.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.