3
$\begingroup$

Question: What is the accuracy required in elevation to distinguish the maximal gravity anomaly of a spherical 50% Haematite (Iron mineral) ore with a radius of 2m at a depth of 10m within a shale section.

I'm trying to solve this problem, first we know that the gravity anomaly of a sphere is that of a point mass at the sphere center equal to the product of the density and volume of the sphere, meaning that only the ρ * V product governs the anomaly and neither the size or density can be determined individually.

Directly above the sphere the maximum anomaly is: enter image description here

We know that in order to correct for gravity's elevation we need to use free-air formula which decreases the gravity by 0.3086 mGal for every meter above sea-level.

Haematite density is: 4.9 - 5.3 (Mg/m^3), let's assume we take the lower bound 4.9 for this case.

But we'll be taking only 50% of 4.9 because only 50% of the ore has haematite.

Also we know that R=2m and h = 10m.

I'm still not sure how to continue from here to find the required accuracy in elevation to distinguish the maximal gravity anomaly because I've some questions like what's the other 50% percent of the iron mineral? should we take in consideration that it's the shale section and above it we have the sandstone? and should we just sum the free air/water correction with the Bouguer correction to get the required accuracy? Any help is highly appreciated.

My approach would be to calculate the free air/water correction first: Depth is 10m which means it's 0.3086 * 10 = 3.086mGal

And Bouguer correction is: δgB = 2πGρh = 2π(6.67e-11)(2.45)(-10) and I took h=-10m because it's under the surface.

Should I combine it somehow to gz_max I mentioned above?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ @Fred Any ideas how to solve this? :) $\endgroup$
    – AnaRhisT
    Dec 4 '21 at 19:30
1
$\begingroup$

Solution:

If gz_max is bigger than the air correction then we're done. because we can measure the signal. and we're done. So gz_max > e_h is the requirement.

(If the error is bigger than the signal anomaly then we can't measure the signal.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.