Coal is still a major source of energy for generation of electricity. So how much energy is used to extract a unit (tonne/kilogram etc) of coal? And thus what is the efficiency of coal as a source of energy?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The answer would vary by country and mining method. Strip vs. longwall vs. drift vs. slope vs. mountaintop vs. open-pit... Do you use many Chinese miners or mighty German Baggers? $\endgroup$ Aug 22, 2014 at 4:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Also the coal deposit. Eg. quality of coal, is it heavily faulted, geological location, etc. $\endgroup$
    – winwaed
    Aug 22, 2014 at 12:57
  • $\begingroup$ Given my lack of knowledge about mining/ coal types I'm looking for a best case / worst case scenario. The man vs mechanical power is an interesting one - in terms of energy efficiency is it better to use a massive machine or a mass of people! $\endgroup$ Aug 23, 2014 at 8:40

1 Answer 1


The efficiency of coal as a source of electricity is very low: typically of the order of 30%. So losses are of the order of 70%. But losses due to energy expended in the extraction of the coal itself only form a very small proportion of this.

Estimates for extractive losses tend to be of the order of 0.5-5%. That's a huge relative range, because the energy density of different types of coal (J/kg) can vary by a factor of 5; the coal could come from a deep mine or an open-cast; and the amount and kind of mechanisation varies hugely.

But these huge relative variations are completely swamped in absolute terms by the other losses, which are at the very best 20%, and can be 65% or so. Which is why there's not a huge amount of literature on the energy inputs to coal extraction: it's such a small part of total losses, that it gets lost in the rounding.

In the British residential electricity supply, there's about 7% losses from local distribution (UK figure), 2-3% from transmission grid, and about 60% losses at the plant itself, in the form of heat (NB efficiencies here are multiplicative, rather than additive). The British average for 2013 was 64.2% losses in plant - see DUKES 2014 table 5.9

CHP plants mitigate this by capturing a large share of the heat, for distribution in local heat grids. But they still have losses of 5-25% at the plant itself, and then further losses in the heat and electricity distribution system. Call it 20% losses in the best case. Denmark has a lot of high-efficiency coal plants and CHP, but still only managed 55% efficiency, so 45% losses (Danish Electricity Supply '08 Statistical Survey, Table 10).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.