Conceptually they seem to be showing the same information. But in the context of a Madden Julien Oscillation (MJO) or equatorial waves especially over the equatorial oceanic layers which one is more useful to look at: 1) OLR Map or, 2) IR Satellite Imagery (black and white satellite pictures of clouds)?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ OLR maps are satellite imagery. $\endgroup$
    – casey
    Nov 18 '14 at 3:29
  • $\begingroup$ I guess the question must be edited to read as InfraRed Satellite Imagery or just black and white satellite pictures of clouds ? $\endgroup$
    – gansub
    Nov 18 '14 at 3:32
  • $\begingroup$ Is the question about visible versus infrared? Outgoing longwave radiation (OLR) is infrared. $\endgroup$ Nov 18 '14 at 4:04
  • $\begingroup$ I guess I need to edit the question again. Would the following work - what extra information is gained from looking at a OLR map rather than looking at a black and white satellite picture of clouds ? $\endgroup$
    – gansub
    Nov 18 '14 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ @IRO-BOT & Casey - I would like to show students the visual of an MJO event- so which one would be better - showing an OLR map or black and white satellite picture of clouds. Please feel free to edit the question. $\endgroup$
    – gansub
    Nov 18 '14 at 7:14

First OLR map is usually graded in flux units (W/m2) thus it is quantitative data, not just a visual picture.

Clouds themselves are not a very reliable indicator of high convection and thunderstorm activity. They could form elsewhere and get blown into a dry region. Also with an OLR map students would not be distracted with the shapes of the clouds.

AIRS OLR products combine infrared and microwave data. Microwave data helps to distinguish between areas of strong convection and nonprecipitating clouds.

Here is a typical OLR product from GOES satellite (taken from Hai-Tien Lee presentation). Such images can be generated with 15 minute interval so the movement of the MJO pattern can be easily observed.

enter image description here

  • $\begingroup$ welcome to Earth Science SE. Nice answer too. $\endgroup$
    – gansub
    Jan 28 '15 at 15:50
  • $\begingroup$ I can see how microwave and infrared both contribute to the understanding of convection and thunderstorm activity, but how does microwave add anything to estimating OLR — which I thought is the total energy emitted to space? Microwave is negligible for the energy budget and for OLR we're interested in looking at what's radiated from cloud tops or areas with high upper tropospheric humidity and reaching space, (blue in the diagram), not at what's radiated from the surface and absorbed by clouds. $\endgroup$
    – gerrit
    Jan 28 '15 at 16:37
  • $\begingroup$ Also, what exactly do you mean by radiation temperature? Monochromatic, integrated over a region, or over the entire spectrum? How does it differ from brightness temperature? $\endgroup$
    – gerrit
    Jan 28 '15 at 16:38
  • $\begingroup$ @gerrit thank you for the comments. It is natural to talk about the temperature of outgoing radiation as an indicator of the temperature of the radiating body. Speaking of OLR we assume the intensity of the radiation at the upper limit of the atmosphere. I retract the temperature units. $\endgroup$ Jan 29 '15 at 15:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Brightness temperatures in the window region on a cloudless day should be pretty close to surface temperatures if surface emissivity is close to 1. $\endgroup$
    – gerrit
    Jan 29 '15 at 16:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.