8
$\begingroup$

The Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM) is a well-studied warming event near the Paleocene-Eocene boundary.
It is characterized by its extreme warming rate: from onset to recovery the event lasted ca. 100 kyrs, and the global temperature is thought to have increased by ~6 °C in barely 20 kyrs.
This event is of particular interest not only for its $\delta^{18}\rm O$ but also a sharp negative excursion in the $\delta^{13}\rm C$, implying a strong input of $^{13}\rm C$-depleted carbon into the system.

Isotopic curves of Paleogene climate, showing abrupt peak at PETM

Simplified and redrawn after Zachos et al. 2001

One frequently invoked hypothesis to explain this input is the leakage of methane from clathrates trapped in seafloor sediments.
Being a paleontologist and not a geochemist, I struggle to understand the actual chemical mechanism involved. I was thus wondering if someone could explain the mechanisms allowing the destabilization of methane clathrates at the same time on a global scale.
If it's just linked to a temperature threshold, how come it wasn't reach prior to that (warmer temperature were reached during the Cretaceous)?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As well as destabilization of clathrates, the finger is often pointed at the 'cooking' of organic rich sediments in the proto-North Atlantic. Today we find Paleogene lavas above carbon-rich sediments - eg. the West of Shetland oil fields. $\endgroup$ – winwaed Nov 21 '14 at 14:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @winwaed Are you refering to studies like Storey et al 2007? Never heard of that theory before today, this is interesting. $\endgroup$ – plannapus Nov 21 '14 at 14:33
  • $\begingroup$ That is interesting indeed... almost renders my answer moot. Though, I did find 2005 and 2014 articles that has suggestions of orbital influences. $\endgroup$ – user889 Nov 21 '14 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ Well one hypothesis doesn't nullify the other, one can easily imagine both phenomena to have co-occurred and co-contributed. $\endgroup$ – plannapus Nov 21 '14 at 16:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @plannapus I was thinking of articles in Geoscientist over the past few years. Unfortunately I don't have the articles handy to find their source references. Yes it could either or both. My understanding was a strong link between the carbon and the volcanism, but uncertainty as to the exact mechanism - cooked sediments and clathrates being the leading contenders. $\endgroup$ – winwaed Nov 21 '14 at 21:51
6
$\begingroup$

There seems to be some uncertainty as to the cause and mechanism for the PETM. In the Science Daily article Methane may be answer to 56-million-year question: Ocean could have contained enough methane to cause drastic climate change (2011) reporting research from Rice University, they claim that the seafloor was already warmer, thus according to their models:

if the oceans were warmer, they would contain less dissolved oxygen and the kinetics for methane formation would have been faster. With less oxygen to consume organic matter on the way down, more sank to the ocean floor, Gu said, and there, with seafloor temperatures higher than they are today, microbes that turn organic matter into methane work faster.

Thus, they claim, the amount methane in the form of clathrates would have been approximately the same amount as today, but in a thinner stability zone. They are not clear about what caused the destabilisation, but made the analogy of a charging-discharging capacitor (shown below, from the same source):

enter image description here

A recent article A seasonality trigger for carbon injection at the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (Eldrett et al. 2014) details of research into what vegetation eisted at the time to determine the species that were present in the time leading up to the PETM (or CIE = Carbon Isotope Excursion), they found that the seasons were already becoming warmer prior to the CIE (which led to the PETM). The reason for the seasonal warming trend is modelled by the authors as being due to

enhanced seasonal contrasts through Milankovitch forcing (Lourens et al., 2005)*, combined with a gradually warming late Paleocene to early Eocene, forced a non-linear response in ocean circulation to warm intermediate waters.

Implying that orbital influences may have had a role in causing the increased seasonal warming leading up to the CIE.

They conclude that the modelled seasonal extremes prior to the onset of the CIE

represent the smoking gun of a climatologically forced threshold in the carbon cycle that caused the PETM.

Essentially by destabilising and altering the stability zone (as shown in the diagram above).

Your question about the Cretaceous raises an important point presented in the earlier article Beyond methane: Towards a theory for the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (Higgins and Schrag, 2006), who suggested that the carbon released from methane clathrates would not have been sufficient for the warming experienced during the PETM.

High global sea-level and flooded continental interiors in the Cretaceous and early Tertiary may have also reduced the export of organic carbon from the shelves to the continental slope by promoting sedimentation on continental shelves that were 75% larger than present

suggesting that there was not enough methane clathrate, that it was 'building up' during the Cretaceous and early Palaeogene.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.