Is it true that Earth's outercore rotates in the opposite direction to Earth's inner-core? Is there a plausible explanation for why this phenomenon occurs and what is the available evidence supporting this notion?

  • $\begingroup$ Can you please provide a link to a claim that the rotation is opposite? $\endgroup$
    – naught101
    Apr 22, 2014 at 3:06
  • $\begingroup$ @naught101, sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130916162005.htm, it says in summary section "while the outer core, comprising mainly molten iron, spins westwards at a slower pace." $\endgroup$
    – Kenshin
    Apr 22, 2014 at 3:09
  • $\begingroup$ @Geodude I would add that reference to the question. $\endgroup$
    – gerrit
    Apr 22, 2014 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Geodude -- This came up as a linked question. The answer depends on perspective. From the perspective of an inertial frame (one in which the mantle makes one rotation per day), the mantle, outer core, and inner core all rotate at almost the same rate, with the outer core rotating slightly slower and the inner core rotating slightly faster than the mantle. From the perspective of a frame rotating with the mantle, the outer core and inner core rotate in opposite directions. $\endgroup$ Aug 13, 2016 at 22:45

3 Answers 3


Is it true that Earth's outercore rotates in the opposite direction to Earth's inner-core?

No. You misread a badly written for-the-masses science article. The article summary is at best rather confusing and misleading. It invites a reader to misinterpret what's going on.

So what's really going on? It's simple, conceptually. The mantle, outer core, and inner core all rotate in more or less the same direction and at more or less the same rate. However, because outer core is liquid, there exists a possibility for the mantle, outer core, and inner core to exhibit slightly different rotation rates (and perhaps even rotation axes). That's apparently what is happening inside the Earth. The mantle and crust make one rotation per sidereal day. The inner core currently rotates a tiny, tiny bit faster than that, while the outer core rotates a tiny, tiny bit slower than that.

This means that when viewed from the perspective of an Earth-fixed observer, the outer core currently appears to be rotating a tiny, tiny bit westward and the inner core currently appears to be rotating a tiny, tiny bit eastward. It's a matter of perhaps confusing perspective. When viewed from an inertial perspective, the mantle, outer core, and inner core are all rotating more or less synchronously.

When you read one of those science-for-the-masses type articles, it's a good idea to jump to the underlying journal article. In this case, you should try reading Livermore, Hollerbach, and Jackson, "Electromagnetically driven westward drift and inner-core superrotation in Earth’s core", PNAS 110:40 (2013).


The answer is that there are more forces than just the momentum of the earth at play. The electromagnetic force generated by the core is pushing on itself, in fact:

"The fact that Earth's internal magnetic field changes slowly, over a timescale of decades, means that the electromagnetic force responsible for pushing the inner and outer cores will itself change over time. This may explain fluctuations in the predominantly eastwards rotation of the inner core, a phenomenon reported for the last 50 years by Tkalčić et al. in a recent study published in Nature Geoscience."

from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130916162005.htm

You see, these changes in the internal portions in the Earth's magnetic field cause a shear. The Earth's magnetic poles are not stationary, they wander. There is clear evidence of this from the paleomagnetic record. This is caused by the viscous convection of the iron nickel outer core. Their numerical models showed that the electromagnetic torque : enter image description here from P.W. Livermore et al. 2013

On the outer core has a westward direction, while the inner core's torque scales accordingly in the opposite direction.

from P.W. Livermore et al. 2013

Finally a cross section (image above) of the asymmetric flow (off dipole) clearly shows opposite direction in the outer core and inner core (blue vs red on the color bar).

So, in summary:

  1. The electromagnetic field is modeled as a dipole, but in actuality has ~10% component that is off the dipole.
  2. The wandering of this dipole (and by consequence, off dipole) magnetic field causes a shear in opposite directions at the inner and outer core.
  3. This inner and outer core shear scales similarly at the edges (at the inner core outer boundary and at the core mantle boundary) but in opposite directions (so they are of the same magnitude).
  4. This torque, causes the flow of the inner core and the outer core to spin in opposite directions, as shown by the last figure.

This is a complex article, let me know if there is anything I could explain better. I think I've got this right.


The earth's core may rotate at a faster rate, not in the opposite direction, this would be consistent with heavier elements sinking to form the core during planetary differentiation. Conservation of angular momentum could cause it to rotate faster. See this question in Physics SE.

What is the evidence for the super-rotation of the earth's core?

  • $\begingroup$ Mark, the inner core rotates at a faster rate, but I believe the outercore actually rotates in the opposite direction to the superrotating inner core. $\endgroup$
    – Kenshin
    Apr 22, 2014 at 3:05
  • $\begingroup$ sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/09/130916162005.htm $\endgroup$
    – Kenshin
    Apr 22, 2014 at 3:39
  • $\begingroup$ doesn't that linked article provide the answer, geodude? $\endgroup$
    – Neo
    Apr 22, 2014 at 3:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Interesting reference thanks. They are proposing an electromagnetic mechanism which could do that. So it is emergent from their computer model? $\endgroup$ Apr 22, 2014 at 3:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, this paper: pnas.org/content/110/40/15914 is the actual journal article science daily references. $\endgroup$
    – Neo
    Apr 22, 2014 at 3:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.