Is the 2-D elevation wave spectrum (as a function of wavenumber and direction, with units of $m^4$) always positive? If so, why would that be the case?


Yes, wave variance or energy spectrum, direcional or non-directional is positive-definite as @aretxabaleta said in the comment.

In linear water-wave theory, the surface elevation is described as a linear superposition of sinusoids:

$$ \eta(t) = \sum_{i-1}^{N}a_i \sin(f_i t + \phi_i) $$

where $a_i$, $f_i$ and $\phi_i$ are the amplitude, frequency and phase, respectively, of each wave component $i$.

The most commonly used wave spectrum is the wave variance spectrum. Wave variance is:

$$ \langle\eta^2\rangle = \dfrac{1}{2N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}a_i^2 = \sigma^2 $$

and wave variance spectrum $F(f)$ is defined such that:

$$ F(f)\Delta{f}=\dfrac{a_i^2}{2} $$

In the limit of $N \rightarrow \infty$ (continuous spectrum), the following holds:

$$ \int_{0}^{\infty}F(f)df = \sigma^2 $$

Being quadratic, both wave variance (spectrum integral) and individual discrete spectrum components are positive-definite.

Note that so far we implied non-directional frequency spectrum, i.e. spectrum defined in frequency space. It can be also defined in wavenumber $k$ space, and the following holds:

$$ \int_{0}^{\infty}F(k)dk = \int_{0}^{\infty}F(f)df = \sigma^2 $$

$$ F(k)\Delta{k} = F(f)\Delta{f} $$

$$ F(k) = F(f)c_g $$

where $c_g$ is group velocity of an individual component.

The non-directional spectrum is simply an integral of directional spectrum over all directions:

$$ \int_{0}^{\infty}F(k)dk = \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}F(k,\theta)dkd\theta $$

Be careful about units here. All spectrum integrals must come up at $m^2$. Thus, $F(k)$ has units of $m^3$ and $F(k,\theta)$ has units of $m^3$ $rad^{-1}$.

If you are considering polar (spectral bins scaling with $k\theta$ instead of $\theta$) directional wavenumber spectrum such that:

$$ \int_{0}^{2\pi}\int_{0}^{\infty}F(k,\theta)k\ dk\ d\theta = \sigma^2 $$

then $F(k,\theta)$ has units of $m^4$ $rad^{-1}$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you milancurcic for your detailed explanation. What exactly does "positive-definite" mean? You used that term a couple times. I have seen it used to describe matrices, but I don't think its definition in matrix theory is one you have in mind. $\endgroup$ Mar 19 '15 at 2:01
  • $\begingroup$ It simply means the function is always real and greater than zero, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive-definite_function. For example, any quantity at even power (2, 4, 6, etc.) is positive definite; in physics, mass and energy are positive-definite quantities; in meteorology and oceanography, humidity and salinity are positive-definite. $\endgroup$ Mar 19 '15 at 2:51
  • $\begingroup$ Okay, that makes sense - thank you. By the way, would you have any suggestions for a reference that has in-depth coverage of the wave spectra? The book chapter aretxabalet mentioned is good but it doesn't cover 2D spectrum, for instance. $\endgroup$ Mar 19 '15 at 3:57
  • $\begingroup$ The wave book by Ian Young is excellent but very expensive store.elsevier.com/product.jsp?isbn=9780080433172. The book by Komen et al. is both broad and thorough, but more accessible cambridge.org/us/academic/subjects/…. There are many papers on the specifics of measuring or modeling directional wave properties, but I am not aware of any general or introductory text. $\endgroup$ Mar 19 '15 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ Alright thanks. If you ever write a book on the subject let us know :) $\endgroup$ Mar 20 '15 at 0:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.