13
$\begingroup$

Both roughness length $z_0$ and zero plane displacement $d$ seemed to be defined as the height above the ground at which wind speed theoretically becomes zero. But wind speed is also supposed to go to zero at $d+z_0$. What is the difference between the two, and how should they actually be defined?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It would be useful if you included a reference for the equivalent definition of $z_0$ and $d$. $\endgroup$ – milancurcic Apr 8 '15 at 17:57
8
$\begingroup$

First some definitions:

$z_0$: Roughness length is defined as the height at which the mean velocity is zero due to substrate roughness. Real walls/ground are not smooth and often have varying degrees of roughness, this parameter (which is determined empirically) accounts for that effect.

$d$: Zero Plane displacement is defined as the height at which the mean velocity is zero due to large obstacles such as buildings/canopy.

The two parameters are not the same because they describe the effects of two fundamentally different processes. $d$ can be anywhere from $6$ to $20$ times larger than $z_0$.

The basis for most turbulence modeling is the eddy viscosity model:

$$-\overline{u'w'} = \nu_t \frac{\partial U}{\partial z}$$

where $\nu_t$ is the eddy viscosity. Employing some scaling arguments with basis on the Prandtl mixing length model and integrating one arrives at the logarithmic law of the wall:

$${U} = \frac{u^*}{\kappa} \ln\, \frac{z}{z_0}$$

Your equation is

$${U} = \frac{u^*}{\kappa} \ln\, \frac{z-d}{z_0}$$ which is the law of the wall with $d = 0$ because it applies to flat plates. It is easy to see then, that by subtracting $d$ from $z$ the effect is to reduce $U$ at that height, which makes sense because large obstacles remove energy from the mean flow and slow it down.

Note that if there are no large obstacles then $d \approx 0$, but $z_0$ is still larger than zero.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Did you intend one of your equations to include d? $\endgroup$ – Semidiurnal Simon Apr 8 '15 at 22:51
  • $\begingroup$ Added for clarity. $\endgroup$ – Isopycnal Oscillation Apr 8 '15 at 23:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.