Is everything in the water column going to be affected?


The answer to your question, based on linear theory, is no. The short answer is that the slope of these waves is very small, and the displacement of the particle paths is proportional to (ak) (times, perhaps, a depth dependent term) with a the wave amplitude and k its wavenumber. Now let's make this answer rigorous.

Recall, for irrotational inviscid 2 dimensional water waves the governing equation is

$$\nabla^2 \phi = 0$$

where $\nabla^2 \equiv \partial_{xx}+\partial_{zz}$ and $\phi$ is the velocity potential. We require particles on the free surface to remain there, and for the pressure to be continuous across the air-water interface, which gives us (assuming the atmospheric pressure to be 0) our surface boundary conditions

$$\left.\eta_t+\phi_x\eta_x = \phi_z\right|_{z=\eta}; \quad \quad \left. \phi_t+\frac{1}{2}(\nabla \phi)^2 +gz=0\right|_{z=\eta},$$

where $\eta(x,t)$ is the free surface displacement. Finally, we require the bottom to be impermeable, hence

$$\phi_z = 0 \quad @ z= -h$$

for $h$ the depth of the water. These are a closed set of equations. Note, the governing equation, ie Laplace's equation, is linear and hence simple to solve. However, the free surface conditions are nonlinear, and more significantly, evaluated at a moving interface. This last condition makes these equations very difficult to solve.

Therefore, to make progress, we generally take asymptotic expansions of these equations. Here, we'll just linearize the equations about some small parameter $\epsilon = ak$ for characteristic wave amplitude $a$ and wavenumber $k$. We will also consider periodic monochromatic waves, so that one can show that the following $\eta,\phi$ satisfy the governing equations to first order in $\epsilon$:

$$\eta = a \cos \theta; \quad \phi = a\omega \sin \theta \frac{\sinh k(z+h)}{\sinh kh},$$

where $\omega$ is the angular frequency given by the dispersion relationship

$$\omega = \sqrt{gk \tanh kh},$$ and $\theta\equiv kx-\omega t$.

To answer your question, we would like to know the behavior of a particle with position $(\xi+x_o,\zeta+z_o)$ originally located at some position $(x_o,z_o)$.This is the Lagrangian description of the fluid. Recall, we can relate the Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions of a fluid through the velocity field, that is

$$\phi_x = \frac{d \xi}{d t}; \quad \phi_z = \frac{d\zeta}{dt}.$$

Substituting in the relations for $\phi$ found above, and then integrating in time, we find

$$\xi =-a\frac{\cosh k(z_o+h)}{\sinh kh} \sin \theta_o; \quad \quad \zeta = a\frac{\sinh k(z_o+h)}{\sinh kh} \cos \theta_o,$$ where $\theta_o =kx_o - \omega t$. We note that the particle displacements from the origin scales with the wave amplitude $a$.

Now, we can eliminate $\theta_o$ by squaring the expressions for the particle position to find

$$\frac{\xi^2}{\left(a\frac{\cosh k(z_o+h)}{\sinh kh} \right)^2 } +\frac{\zeta^2}{\left(a\frac{\sinh k(z_o+h)}{\sinh kh} \right)^2 }= 1$$

which describes an ellipse. I've attached a figure from Kundu and Cohen which illustrates this. enter image description here

Now we can finally talk about some physics, and answer your question. For deep water waves, when $kh \ll 1$, the above relation reduces to the equation for a circle, hence the particles have a circular orbit which decays with depth (with an e-folding scale that goes like the wave number). For shallow water waves, i.e. $kh$ small, our equation describes an ellipse with a semi major axis that is much much larger than the semi minor axis, hence there's is nearly horizontal motion that doesn't decay much with depth.

Tsunamis have wavenumbers that are large enough so that even in the middle of the ocean they fall into the shallow water regime, meaning that the particle trajectories are approximately very flat ellipses, or horizontal lines, and this does not decay with depth. However, their deviations from their origin will be very small, as their slope $ak$ is very very small, e.g. $\mathcal{O}(1^{-5})$ for numbers I looked up online. Therefore, it's very unlikely that this will have much of an effect on a passive tracer.

Now, the story is very different as the wave approaches shore and steepens. But this is a different story for a different day.

I hope this helps. Feel free to ask any other questions,



Remember that a wave when it passes moves every particle up and down (with no horizontal component) so in deep water tsunamis have very little affect on anything. In addition, the wavelength/amplitude of these waves is huge so the water rises very gently and it is hardly noticed in deep water. In fact, the safest place to be when a tsunami is coming (beside high ground) is out at sea in deep water.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I thought that particles would move in a circular/ellipsoidal fashion like this upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8b/… $\endgroup$ – reddit Jul 4 '15 at 19:34
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I think the confusion is how the wave is generated. A sinusoidal wave passing through water is not going to have a net horizontal movement (e.g., when a wave from a tsunami passes through water). However, waves generated by friction from wind blowing on the surface do generate some net horizontal movement. But your question relates to the affect of life in the oceans as a tsunami wave passes by. I tell my students that descriptions of tsunami's passing on the ocean under boats are rarely felt because the wavelength/amplitude is so huge. Basically life is unaffected. $\endgroup$ – see you Jul 4 '15 at 21:22
  • $\begingroup$ @MarcDefant But if it is sinusoidal it makes me think even more strongly that the path should be circular/ellipsoidal (does not mean there is net forward transport). Wouldnt biology follow that orbital path as well? $\endgroup$ – reddit Jul 5 '15 at 5:49
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting question and instructive answer! From what I understand of linear (sinusoidal) waves, the water particles may have a small non-zero instantaneous horizontal velocity (as part of the circular motion reddit referred to), but the net or average velocity is zero, as Marc Defant pointed out. $\endgroup$ – user4624937 Jul 5 '15 at 5:52
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ As noted in other comments, this answer is wrong. Particle motion in a transverse wave follows an elliptical pattern, and I have no reason to think that a tsunami would be different. It is true that the net horizontal motion will be close to zero (but then again, so will the net vertical motion), but this does not mean there is no affect on the water column or the seabed. I imagine that there is little effect because, as noted, in deep water tsunamis have low amplitude - but I'm not expert enough to say this for sure. $\endgroup$ – Semidiurnal Simon Jul 5 '15 at 7:16

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.