Something just clicked in my head today. Rocks, by the definition I was taught, are composed of minerals which in turn are by definition not organic, so they are or were not alive.

However. Coal, bitumen, and shale are all made of organic matter. Why are they classified under sedimentary carbonaceous rocks?


I'm not sure why you are including shale in your question, unless you are referring to carbonaceous shale, which in not coal, but shale with carbon throughout the matrix of the shale.

Shale is an argillaceous rock, and argillaceous rocks are "detrital sedimentary rocks" [1]. They are composed of clays and the bedding plane within the shales is "due to the orientation of the clay minerals" [1]. Clearly a sedimentary rock.

Coal however, as you state in your question is derived from organic material - vegetation. The deposition of the vegetation material is analogous to the deposition of minerals that formed sedimentary rocks.

Both materials, vegetation and minerals, were transported to a location. In the case of minerals the transportation may have been a long or short distance and carried out by wind, water or gravity (mudslides). Vegetation tends to travel shorter distances than minerals but like the minerals it has traveled and it accumulates.

Over time the vegetation compacts, is heated, undergoes chemical reactions and experiences a very slow form of metamorphosis and petrification.

Being composed of carbon, coal forms a carbonaceous deposit. Having been transported and accumulated in a single deposit it is sedimentary. Having undergone metamorphosis and petrification it is a rock. Consequently it is reasonable to classify coal as a carbonaceous sedimentary rock.

[1] D. G. A Whitten with J. R. V. Brooks, Penguin Dictionary of Geology, 1979

  • $\begingroup$ It is pragmatic and useful as you point out to consider coal a sedimentary rock. All coal will contain a small fraction of mineral matter and most if not all shale will contain a fraction of organic matter. It is a continuum. $\endgroup$ – haresfur Oct 13 '15 at 0:29

Rocks are not necessarily made out of minerals. Yes, most of them are but it's not a requirement. Also, not every collection of minerals is a rock. For instance, sand is not a rock.

This is not limited to rocks of biogenic origin. Take for example obsidian, or volcanic glass. In some cases there is not a single mineral in the rock, yet it is a rock.

My own personal opinion about definitions (especially in geology) is that occasionally they're useless. What happens if you have a borderline case that falls out of the strict definition? Remember - names and definitions are an artificial thing that we, humans, invented. Nature doesn't always play by our rules.

  • $\begingroup$ My definition of a rock is that it's one or more mineraloids hardened together. That allows for amorphous silicates to be rocks, at least. $\endgroup$ – person27 Apr 14 at 18:04

Coal as a sedimentary rock:

Sedimentary rocks are formed from solid debris and dissolve minerals matter produced by mechanical and chemical breakdown of pre-existing rocks or in some cases from skeletal material of dead plants and animals.

Source: C.D. Gribble, 2012: Rutley's Elements of Mineralogy. 27th ed. Springer Netherlands, 496pp

The sediment in an organic sediment rock is made of fossils.

Plants remain squashed deep underground over millions of years make an organic sedimentary rock called coal.Coal doesn't look like it is made of sediments.It is also often difficult to seee the plant fossils within it because they have become so compacted over time,the less stable materials have left and all that remains is carbon.

Source: https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091201222522AAFc6hi

And coal is carbonaceous material.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.