Many accounts claim that the Magnetic Field of the Earth has been seriously degrading for the past centuries and we are currently in the process of the so called Polar Shift. How likely would it be for Earth to experience this phenomenon. Is it really possible?

What would be the possible effect to human beings if this happens?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Polar or Pole shift can suggest more than one meaning. Probably better to say magnetic pole shift or geomagnetic polar shift or reversal. You said earth, so Geo is redundant I realize, but you mean this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_reversal not this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pole_shift_hypothesis $\endgroup$
    – userLTK
    Commented Oct 28, 2015 at 12:21
  • $\begingroup$ "wall of text" not withstanding, I found it all very interesting and a lot of it makes sense. Too many academics try to put the thought down by picking on the format. Whatever. I've been looking around for explanations for what is happening, (and it is happening by the way) and this seemed to be a very good explanation. Keep it up. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20, 2022 at 0:20

3 Answers 3


Is it possible for Earth to experience Polar Shift?

Yes, and it has happened before.

In the past 80 million years it happened over 150 times. The last time this happened was around 800 thousand years ago. A quick note about what a polar shift is, more properly termed a geomagnetic reversal. Earth's magnetic is such that a compass points to a certain direction. For example, a modern compass would point north. In a reversal, it would point south instead because the poles are reversed. Without going too much into detail, this occurs not by spinning of the poles but rather by decreasing in intensity until it becomes negative, thus reversing the poles.

Another important thing is the intensity. A strong magnetic field shields Earth's from some kinds of radiation, for example the stuff you can see in Gordon's answer. However, a reversed but strong magnetic field is just as fine. What you should be worried about is the change in the intensity of the field, and this is going up and down all the time, quite rapidly as you can see in the following figure:

enter image description here

The black bit (called Brunhes) is now - when the magnetic field is "normal". The white field in the bottom is more than ~780 thousand years ago, when it was reversed (called Matuyama). As you can see, even though the magnetic field has been normal though this entire time, the intensity went up and down. So yes, a reversal would mean that at one point the intensity would be very low, but this can happen even without a reversal.

What would be the possible effect to human beings if this happens?

In contrast to what some people on the Internet claim, there would be no earthquake or volcanoes or other scary stuff related to it. This is simply not how this works. Also, mass extinctions from the geological history are not correlated with geomagnetic reversals, so you can take that worry off your mind. What can happen is detailed in a good way in Gordon's answer. Nothing too scary.

Magnetic Field of the earth is seriously degrading for the past centuries and we are currently in the process of the so called Polar Shift

Not necessarily. It seriously degraded many times before without associated geomagnetic reversals.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Didn't see it mentioned, but we can observe the history of polar reversals by examining magnetized iron particles in basalt sea floor rock (rock created by magma at tectonic plate boundaries). When the magma first reaches the water, it starts to rapidly cool. In this process, the magnetic particles align in the liquid magma pointing towards whatever happens to be the current N and S. We can see layers where the N and S ends are seemingly pointed in the opposite direction of present day. There are many of these layers, which, along with dating techniques, give us a timeline of polar reversals. $\endgroup$
    – SnakeDoc
    Commented Oct 28, 2015 at 18:19
  • $\begingroup$ @SnakeDoc Yes, magnetized iron particles created by magma is good reference to tell the magnetism history of the earth, other scientist even used ancient clay pots. $\endgroup$
    – stack
    Commented Oct 29, 2015 at 3:13
  • $\begingroup$ This answer would be improved by a reference or two, at least for the figure (a basic requirement), or links. The cross-references to @gordon's answer don't help — he doesn't give any links or references either. $\endgroup$
    – Matt Hall
    Commented Nov 16, 2015 at 13:02

Yes, it is not just possible, but highly probable.

Detailed palaeomagnetic data have revealed how the Earth's magnetic field changes in a polarity shift. In relative terms (time scale inaccurately known) there is a slow decrease to <10% of the normal field intensity. After an uncertain interval the field intensity picks up to some 20 or 30% of the normal field intensity during a relatively brief spike. Then another low field intensity interval, and finally it picks up to full field intensity - of either normal or reversed polarity.

This has never happened in real-time during the scientific era, so the effects are necessarily speculative. Amongst the expected effects would be:

  1. Vulnerability of satellites, power lines and communications to the effects of solar storms.

  2. Increased UV, and hence increased incidence of skin cancer.

  3. All sorts of changing physico-chemical processes in the upper atmosphere, of which the weakening ozone layer would be the most alarming.

On average these magnetic flips occur about every 11,000 to 12,000 years - although there is a great deal of variation. On this basis the next one is about due.

It won't be lethal. Neanderthals, Denisovans and Hom.sap's prehistoric forebears survived the last magnetic flip, but it will be inconvenient, and probably not without a serious health impact.

  • $\begingroup$ It might not be directly lethal to organisms on the planet but given the fragility of the current global politico-economic system, I suspect it might be a tad more than inconvenient. Knockout of GPS, satcoms and mobile telephony would be enough to trigger an economic recession at the very least. If electricity production and distribution was affected (cf. Carrington Event en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859), we could expect severe civil disruption. Wars and governmental collapse in some regions could not be excluded. So yes, a serious health impact. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2015 at 11:03
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @gerrit No electricity means discomfort and hardship. No communications means general unrest, lower productivity, and slower response times of things like police and emergency services, as well as making it harder to clear up the inevitable disagreements before things turn nasty. So you've got the populace enduring hardship, getting angry, and feeling they aren't being listened to who, and a government who's slow to respond and lacking their usual level of situational awareness and technological advantage. In short, the playing field is more level and the civilians are angry. Tinderbox. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2015 at 15:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @OwenBoyle: to my knowledge, GPS, satcoms and mobile telephony are not at all dependant on the Earth's magnetic field polarity. Unless the field's intensity rises enough and fast enough to fry electronics, I don't see how they would be affected. Or did I miss something? I think the only tecnology to break just by polarity would be compass-based navigation (very important for ships and airplanes) $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 28, 2015 at 19:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Regarding ozone, it isn't the magnetic reversal as such that is the problem; it is the weakening of the Earth's magnetic field during the transition that allows more cosmic rays and solar wind (charged particles) to disrupt the normal equilibrium between ozone synthesis and decay. Such disruption occurs all the time due to solar storms, atmospheric pollutants and seasonal daylight hours. The extent to which this would be exacerbated by a weakening magnetic field is debatable, but the consensus is that the ozone depletion would be 'huge'. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 29, 2015 at 1:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @EmilioMBumachar the reduction of the field during the reversal greatly decreases Earth's protection from the solar proton flux, which means satellites would be much more likely to be killed by solar storms. And although I'm not sure, the interaction of the proton flux with the remnant magnetic field could also cause larger geomagnetic storms than we have today, interfering with power grids and ground-based communications. $\endgroup$
    – hobbs
    Commented Oct 29, 2015 at 4:28

Please consider that the strength of the magnetic field determines atmospheric density and pressure. Planets with strong magnetic fields have thick oceans and atmosphere, while planets with very weak magnetic fields have no oceans and very thin atmosphere. That's because hydrogen atoms from solar winds are attracted and condensed around magnetic fields and the strength of the MF dictates the atmospheric density, and atmospheric pressure dictates the ocean levels. Mars for example shows signs of erosion as it had oceans and atmosphere but when the dynamo inside went through a hard double flip (most probably) and slowed down so much, cooled down so much that it could never recover, the atmosphere was blown away by solar winds, oceans boiled away, etc. Mars's gravity field doesn't explain how it lost its oceans and atmosphere when Earth still has them. Mars's gravity field didn't change, it lost its magnetic field. Jupiter's bigger moons have thick ocean frozen at the surface (frozen because of distance from the Sun) but they are smaller than Mars and have strong magnetic fields.. So size and amount of pressure inside doesn't necessarily mean a stronger magnetic field,, what all planets and terrestrial moons with strong MF have in common is an inner core that makes a small orbit around the center of the planet/moon, because of tidal effect (gravitational pull) from a big body nearby. For example, Earth's inner core is attracted by our big and heavy Moon, and it's not spinning in the dead center of Earth but has a small orbit around the center, planar to the Moon's orbit, and it stirs the soup inside as Earth spins on itself. It keeps the soup warm and generates friction thus electric currents, thus electromagnetism. Jupiter's moons have their inner core drawing a larger orbit inside as they (moons) spin on themselves, their core is off-centered toward Jupiter. Our Moon is actually the big core of an ancient planet that collided with our former (smaller) planet about 4.5 Billion years ago. Their liquid matter blobbed together and the smaller core bounced from the explosion as just the right speed and angle to stabilize on orbit, and the little bit of liquid matter on it cooled fast with a tide towards Earth, witch is the heavier side of the Moon that always point to Earth. With time it gathered the splash from the collision. It's a big metal core with a thin crust and this is why it rings like a bell and the craters are all shallow. So anyway.. we're very lucky to have the Moon because otherwise Earth would be like Mars right now. Mars doesn't have a big moon so its core just spins in the center and doesn't generate enough friction. Maybe it had a moon before, with an unstable orbit destined to swing away.. Now, why does our MF tend to flip every 12-13000 years, or twice every Great Year (Precession of the Equinoxes, a 26000-year Milankovitch Cycle when the Earth's spin tilt axis wobbles 360*)? I think it's because there are 2 critical tilt angles, during the Precession,, where the spin inertia of the iron currents, plus the angle of the inner core's orbit (planar to the Moon's orbit, not the same angle as the Earth's rotation axis),, plus the difference in speed (earth spins on itself in one day while the Moon takes 27.3 days to go around Earth),,, produce electric currents that don't agree with the magnetic field orientation and forces it to either reverse or migrate.. (to visualize this, have a pot of sauce that represents Earth, a wooden spoon that represents the inner core and an imaginary moon that goes around the pot in 27 days. Turn the pot of sauce continually to simulate earth's rotation and imagine it's tilted 23.4*,, and place the spoon (core) off-centered in the pot and tilt the spoon to simulate the difference in angles of the Earth's spin and of the moon's orbit plane. As you spin the pot, continuously, slowly orbit the spoon in the same time as your imaginary moon,, and see the currents you're generating in the sauce.. Then slowly change the tilt of the spoon to simulate Earth's precession.. It sounds fun? Do this to really get a visual).. Now during the reversal or excursion process, the convection currents need to reorient and mix and slow down, producing less friction thus less electromagnetism, so the atmosphere gets thinner and filters out less solar and cosmic radiation. Less friction also means less heat produced inside the planet, so the volume of the planet has to shrink a little bit, and that explains the spike in seismic and volcanic activity around the Peak. What explains how ocean levels can drop 400ft? Well if the atmosphere is thin during the day, then raw solar radiation evaporates tons and tons of ocean surface and during the night it gets very cold so all the moisture in the air has to precipitate within hours. Most of it falls back in the oceans and on land, and some of it becomes atmosphere and is eventually blown away by solar winds. That explains the biblical amounts of precipitations and erosion (Grand Canyon fills up and deserts turn into seas and the northern atmosphere is covered with very thick glaciers, big mammals flash frozen, etc).. Flash frost is also explained by rapid atmospheric density drop when a CME impacts the already thin atmosphere and temporarily blows some of it away: pressure drops fast and flash-freezes everything at the surface. A thin atmosphere also explains the number of meteorite impacts because meteors rain down every day but usually burn with friction, blow up into small bits and only tiny bits of metal reach the ground,, but when the atmosphere is thin, meteors have much less friction so better chances to hit the ground in bigger chunks. Those 2 critical tilt angles during the Precession are: one as we enter Leo (the stronger magnetic Excursions (double flips) like the Gothenburg Magnetic Excursion 13000 years ago and the Leschamp Magnetic Excursion 40000 years ago, etc) and the other one as we enter Aquarius (the mild semi-reversals (also calles Excursions) like now, or like the Lake Mungo Magnetic Excursion 26000 years ago,, etc). This is all over ancient civilizations calendars, like the Mayan calendar, etc. For Example, the Sphinx was pointing Leo 13000 years ago, but was probably built 11000 years ago after the Younger Dryas warming, as a big immortal monument to commemorate this strong event that almost got us extinct. Also, one important principal, heat generated inside the planet goes up slowly through the crust, then slowly raises up in the oceans, then joins the heat on the surface from solar radiations, and that heat has to go up in the atmosphere to reach the space vacuum.. The stronger the magnetic field and the thicker the oceans and the atmosphere,,, and the slower heat can reach up into space. Vice-versa, the thinner the oceans and atmosphere and the faster heat can reach up into space.. We could say that at Peak, a typical day would be like: super windy as almost unfiltered solar radiation expands the air very rapidly,, then all day would feel like a super hot sauna with tons of melting and floods, and evaporation would look like a steam engine.. Then, as the Sun starts to set the sky veils with thick condensation. Shortly after, deluges and super flash floods, turning into super ice storm breafly, then meters of snow until the air is dry and very cold, like -50C (moisture can stay in the air up to -20C but lower than that, all humidity is already deposited, so all moisture in the air has to deposit within a few hours)... Then, in the morning it starts all over again. Sometimes when there is a CME impact, it gets worse. OK, I'll stop here, will elaborate more if there is interest.. Please give me feedback,, wherever I'm wrong and how I should rethink.. Thanks

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ This is wrong on so many accounts, I wouldn't even know where to begin, but your final sentence in which you ask what's wrong and where you should rethink, obviously means that this all is how you think things should be and not what you've learned through acquired knowledge. $\endgroup$
    – BillDOe
    Commented Jan 11, 2019 at 20:46
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I'm downvoting because it's unreadable. Have you ever heard of paragraphs? Proper punctuation? This is a wall of text. $\endgroup$
    – Gimelist
    Commented Jan 11, 2019 at 23:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ A.) I didn't downvote; B.) There's not enough space in comments to itemize everything you've gotten wrong; C.) Stack Exchange is a question and answer forum, not discussion, nor is it a place to air your hypotheses. $\endgroup$
    – BillDOe
    Commented Jan 11, 2019 at 23:48
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ you did only expand the wall of text with the edit,you made the wall of text less readable. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 12, 2019 at 7:42
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It is hard to expand on the content of your answer if it is hard to digest the information presented in it due to formatting. If you make the information easier to read, then it will be easier to determine if the information presented is useful. $\endgroup$
    – Jon P
    Commented Feb 18, 2019 at 4:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.