3
$\begingroup$

I was under the impression GWP (global-warming potential) is the measure of a gas' impact on global warming, in comparison with CO2.

E.g. methane has a GWP of 86 over 20 years - Wikipedia

Comparing paper and ceramic cups for GWP, this article (page 24) shows GWP in kilograms. Does this make sense to show GWP in kg? Can anyone explain why?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Question was cross-posted here $\endgroup$ – THelper Dec 16 '15 at 8:21
5
$\begingroup$

Rather than using the GWP as a ratio, they are expressing the GWP as compared to a release of $\ce{CO2}$ with equivalent radiative effects. To use their numbers use the mass they give you and a GWP ratio of 1 for that mass (as if it were carbon dioxide). From what I've seen for chemical industry sales and marketing literature it is fairly common that they express GWP this way in units of "$\ce{CO2}$ equivalent".

In other words, they are saying whatever their product is made of and its production methods have the same radiative forcing as $x$ kg of $\ce{CO2}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.