Earth Science Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in the geology, meteorology, oceanography, and environmental sciences. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Plate tectonics effectively rubbished the theory of geophysical global cooling as a means of explaining many surface features on the Earth. However, this wiki says that the same process is responsible for certain surface features on the surfaces of Mercury and the Moon.
Do such processes play no role in Earth's Geology? Or are they only effective on smaller bodies? Why?
The effects one can see on other planets (and many of the icy moons in the solar system) are typically faults and scarps due to the fact that during cooling, these bodies contracted. Since the surface was solid, the only way to accommodate the contraction is through faults.
But Earth's surface is not solid on long time scales. We have plates that move, scrape, and subduct. If you shrink the perimeter of Earth slowly, you don't get compression faults. Rather, you're just going to accelerate subduction a little bit and maybe slow down mid-ocean ridges a bit.
In the end, the point is that the system of plates that covers Earth can accommodate slow shrinkage of Earth without producing visible faults.
