5
$\begingroup$

Is it possible to find pleochroic halos in muscovite ? I would have said that it must be biotite (also, in PPL it is brown!), but then.. why does it have interference colors so similar to muscovite ? Or is it anything else ? Thanks for help !

PPL

enter image description here

In high resolution here: Biotite with pleochroic halos (30 µm thin section, XPL).

XPL

enter image description here

In high resolution here: Biotite with pleochroic halos (30 µm thin section, XPL).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ @Spencer I hadn't seen it, there is one with polarized micrograph, untaged to prevent its deletion :) $\endgroup$
    – user12525
    Aug 29, 2019 at 9:18

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

It's biotite. Not muscovite. That's why you have the pleochroic halos in it.

I don't understand why you are saying that the interference colours are like muscovite. First of all, the lack of cleavage suggests you are looking down (or close to) the x axis, so this means the interference colours you see are going to be very low. Let's say 1st order white or brown. And then, it's going to get the anomalous brown colour of the biotite together with it, which is exactly what you see here. Also, muscovite is not brown in ppl. This one is. Therefore, it's biotite.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

One doesn't see pleochroic haloes in muscovite, I suspect because the crystal lattice of muscovite isn't conducive to developing inclusions of allanite and other radioactive minerals. I suggest you measure the 2V- to distinguish between muscovite and the paler varieties of biotite. Note that the more magnesian-rich varieties of biotite, i.e. phlogopite, can be very pale brown in PPL.

I don't attach much credence to interference colours because the range of colours in muscovite and phlogopite overlap, and can appear very similar. Also, slightly coloured crystals tend to mask the interference colours, so it may be difficult to judge.

One may ask 'why pleochroic haloes in biotite, but not in muscovite?', as in 2-mica schist. I can't prove it, but it is known that uranium adsorbs onto Fe-rich surfaces of the biotite, so my hypothesis is that adsorbed uranium serves as crystallization foci for adjacent allanite crystalls, which are then enclosed as inclusions as the biotite crystal continues to grow. You won't see this in muscovite because of the absence of Fe.

It is curious that inclusions of magnetite can occur in muscovite, but not radioactive mineral inclusions - at least, not that I have ever seen. I don't know why. Anyone else have any ideas on this?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ You should post your last paragraph as a new question -- I for one would be interested to read any answers it may attract. $\endgroup$
    – Pont
    Dec 2, 2016 at 8:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.