Skip to main content

New answers tagged

0 votes

What is technically wrong with Wijngaarden & Happer's paper claiming to show that CO2's contribution to surface warming is saturated?

With respect to the peer reviewed status, peer review is broken, even Nature recognizes that. The insistence on peer review is generally by those who are unable to assess a paper for themselves or are ...
Peter's user avatar
  • 1
-3 votes

What is technically wrong with Wijngaarden & Happer's paper claiming to show that CO2's contribution to surface warming is saturated?

The paper by W.A. van Wijngaarden & W. Happer has not been published. Only a preprint has been uploaded by the Authors in arXiv. Preprints and early-stage research uploaded in arXiv have not been ...
Riccardo's user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included