Timeline for Did temperature for the US state of Illinois reach an all-time record low 1/31/2019?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 1, 2019 at 16:45 | comment | added | JeopardyTempest | @gansub it's worth noting, the new IBM global modeling effort is supposed to more heavily use such independent sensors more... will thus be something interesting to compare against and see if it is helpful or harmful to forecasts | |
Jan 31, 2019 at 21:58 | history | edited | dplmmr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 31 characters in body
|
Jan 31, 2019 at 18:48 | history | edited | dplmmr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Jan 31, 2019 at 18:31 | history | edited | dplmmr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 109 characters in body
|
Jan 31, 2019 at 17:50 | comment | added | dplmmr | That looks like the same class of Automated Weather Observing System (AWOS) mentioned by the State Climatologist Office for the -37 °F measurement, and the reports around that time don't have any error codes. So a site like that could conceivably produce an official record low temperature if it passed a more detailed quality control analysis (although in this case I wouldn't be surprised if it doesn't get any special attention since it wouldn't quite make a major new record). | |
Jan 31, 2019 at 17:41 | comment | added | DavePhD | This report of -35 °F wrh.noaa.gov/mesowest/… looks more official. But that doesn't specify what the minimum was, only reports at 20 minute intervals. | |
Jan 31, 2019 at 17:18 | comment | added | dplmmr | My understanding is that the surface observational data assimilated into operational forecast models typically comes from only a set of "official" stations with at least some known maintenance/quality control criteria, not the set of all possible weather stations. That's mainly based on my recollection of what I've learned from the US forecast model community, and based on results from some searching (e.g. the UK community: rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/qj.2372) it seems to hold up at least to some extent. But that's probably a topic worthy of its own entire question. | |
Jan 31, 2019 at 17:08 | history | edited | dplmmr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
Jan 31, 2019 at 16:48 | history | answered | dplmmr | CC BY-SA 4.0 |