Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 18, 2014 at 19:31 history edited DrewP84 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 46 characters in body
Apr 17, 2014 at 0:45 comment added DrewP84 I merely wished to illustrate soil temperatures at 4500m in Tibet throughout a typical year. The soil is sub-freezing nearly half of the year, but does warm with longer-days. So, you are right that it still gets relatively 'hot'. Tibetan soil and moisture study PDF
Apr 16, 2014 at 17:10 comment added gerrit That soil temperature graph is interesting, where is it from, what is the context?
Apr 16, 2014 at 14:22 history edited DrewP84 CC BY-SA 3.0
The atmosphere as a whole is not lifting from sea level, so I should've referenced the environmental lapse rate of 6.5°C/1000m instead of dry adiabatic lapse rate of 9,8°C/1000m..
Apr 16, 2014 at 3:51 comment added DrewP84 Tibetan Soil Temperature at 4450m near Nagqu
Apr 16, 2014 at 3:39 comment added DrewP84 A surface would struggle to store substantial amount of heat at that altitude. There are too many sources of heat loss surrounding any point that attempted to warm. In any direction above the surface, there would be cold, dry air sapping heat from said surface. In any direction to the sides or below an insolated surface, you would have colder earth also sapping any heat. Any kind of wind would only further accelerate the heat drain.
Apr 16, 2014 at 3:19 comment added gerrit Right. The horizontal temperature gradient is instable. But a patch of sand in the sun in Tibet would probably still get really hot, I suppose.
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:10 history edited DrewP84 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 2 characters in body
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:05 history answered DrewP84 CC BY-SA 3.0