Timeline for How do I explain why the Tibetan plateau is colder than lowlands at similar latitudes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 18, 2014 at 19:31 | history | edited | DrewP84 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 46 characters in body
|
Apr 17, 2014 at 0:45 | comment | added | DrewP84 | I merely wished to illustrate soil temperatures at 4500m in Tibet throughout a typical year. The soil is sub-freezing nearly half of the year, but does warm with longer-days. So, you are right that it still gets relatively 'hot'. Tibetan soil and moisture study PDF | |
Apr 16, 2014 at 17:10 | comment | added | gerrit♦ | That soil temperature graph is interesting, where is it from, what is the context? | |
Apr 16, 2014 at 14:22 | history | edited | DrewP84 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
The atmosphere as a whole is not lifting from sea level, so I should've referenced the environmental lapse rate of 6.5°C/1000m instead of dry adiabatic lapse rate of 9,8°C/1000m..
|
Apr 16, 2014 at 3:51 | comment | added | DrewP84 | Tibetan Soil Temperature at 4450m near Nagqu | |
Apr 16, 2014 at 3:39 | comment | added | DrewP84 | A surface would struggle to store substantial amount of heat at that altitude. There are too many sources of heat loss surrounding any point that attempted to warm. In any direction above the surface, there would be cold, dry air sapping heat from said surface. In any direction to the sides or below an insolated surface, you would have colder earth also sapping any heat. Any kind of wind would only further accelerate the heat drain. | |
Apr 16, 2014 at 3:19 | comment | added | gerrit♦ | Right. The horizontal temperature gradient is instable. But a patch of sand in the sun in Tibet would probably still get really hot, I suppose. | |
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:10 | history | edited | DrewP84 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
Apr 16, 2014 at 1:05 | history | answered | DrewP84 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |