Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 10 at 23:43 comment added Josiah Those clasts, if they are rocks and not individual mineral grains, are most correctly referred to as "intraclasts".
Aug 9, 2016 at 15:35 vote accept ShemSeger
Mar 2, 2016 at 4:23 comment added ShemSeger @Antonio I'm very familiar with erratics. Actually, the Big Rock in Okotoks, Alberta pictured on that wikipedia article isn't far from here, only about a 2hrs drive. There's another one 40 minutes away, called the Glenwood erratic, both are popular for bouldering, I've climbed on both. I vote for calling the released clast an, "emancipated clast."
Mar 1, 2016 at 9:16 comment added Antonio I agree, it's just a clast. But I see the point of naming it something else after it's been released from the matrix material. In this case, the original sandstone acts like a carrier which then releases the boulders after. It reminds me of a glacial boulder which is sometimes called a "glacial erratic".
Feb 29, 2016 at 22:38 comment added Ben MS If they're loose stones that have been eroded out and mobilised from being in a conglomerate, then they are referred to as whatever the relevant grain size is, from here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grain_size The ones that you're talking about would just be boulders.
Feb 29, 2016 at 21:29 comment added Gimelist @ShemSeger I'm not a sure there is a term for "rocks that used to be lithoclasts but are now just boulders sitting there". If there is, it's mostly likely an obscure term that no one knows unless you're an extremely old professor that insists on using excess jargon.
Feb 29, 2016 at 13:28 comment added ShemSeger Then what do you refer to the stones as after they've been freed from the sandstone? There are large stones out there just laying in the sand like eratics, but they are there because they eroded out of the hoodoo.
Feb 29, 2016 at 3:30 history answered Ben MS CC BY-SA 3.0