Timeline for Actual thickness of permafrost vs theoretical maximum possibly permafrost thickness
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2016 at 13:05 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 17, 2016 at 4:29 | comment | added | Keith McClary | Permafrost can be thinner under lakes if they are deep enough not to freeze to the bottom. | |
| S Oct 22, 2016 at 15:11 | history | suggested | Daniel Griscom | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Integrating fake-answer text into question
|
| Oct 22, 2016 at 14:47 | answer | added | marsisalie | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 22, 2016 at 14:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 22, 2016 at 15:11 | |||||
| Oct 22, 2016 at 12:34 | answer | added | user6834 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 22, 2016 at 0:41 | comment | added | marsisalie | It would be great to have more information. With the parameters you provide I am not sure how to obtain 75 to 375 m for the depth. Also - I have never seen a permafrost body with a mean annual surface temperature of -3 °C reaching 375 m depth. Let's set the numbers straight before going further. What area is this? | |
| Oct 21, 2016 at 13:12 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 21, 2016 at 15:36 | |||||
| Oct 21, 2016 at 13:04 | history | asked | user6825 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |