Skip to main content

Timeline for How long to melt all the polar ice?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

28 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 13, 2019 at 5:15 history edited Camilo Rada
edited tags
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://earthscience.stackexchange.com/ with https://earthscience.stackexchange.com/
May 2, 2014 at 23:29 history edited hichris123 CC BY-SA 3.0
Fix formatting, fix grammar
May 1, 2014 at 19:18 comment added gerrit @ravenspoint I meant that the mountains on Antarctica might have small glaciers long after the Himalayan ice sheets are gone. But for your order of magnitude calculation probably is not a major issue.
May 1, 2014 at 18:43 answer added Peter Jansson timeline score: 16
May 1, 2014 at 18:28 answer added David Hammen timeline score: 10
May 1, 2014 at 17:46 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 178 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 17:44 answer added ravenspoint timeline score: -6
May 1, 2014 at 17:42 comment added ravenspoint Note for anyone who saw my earlier estimate of 63 years. I mistook kJ for J, so had three orders of magnitude error. Please double check for other mistakes.
May 1, 2014 at 17:40 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 33 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 17:24 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 120 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 17:22 comment added ravenspoint I think it is correct to assume that, whatever happens, the antartic ice sheet will be the last to go. So, therefore, I do not care how ling it takes to melth the glaciers in the himalyas, etc. The lower boundary does not have to be realistic, just a provable minimum.
May 1, 2014 at 17:20 comment added gerrit Do you mean you're looking for a realistic lower boundary on time estimates for everything to melt? Also, what does it mean to melt all polar ice? No glaciers left in the mountains, or "just" the ice sheets? I think this could be a great question if you specify a little better exactly what kind of answer you're looking for.
May 1, 2014 at 17:18 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 124 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 16:39 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 27 characters in body
S May 1, 2014 at 16:28 history suggested Torbjørn T. CC BY-SA 3.0
Formatting, MathJax.
May 1, 2014 at 16:25 review Suggested edits
S May 1, 2014 at 16:28
May 1, 2014 at 16:13 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 367 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 16:08 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 367 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 16:02 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 367 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 15:49 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 100 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 15:49 comment added kaberett Need to take into account albedo; and for anything other than an extremely rough-and-ready calculation, need to take into account contact with seawater, seawater temperatures, etc.
May 1, 2014 at 15:43 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 211 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 15:43 comment added tobias47n9e I hope everyone has seen this picture: grist.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/humble-oil.jpg
May 1, 2014 at 15:30 review First posts
May 1, 2014 at 17:21
May 1, 2014 at 15:23 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 255 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 15:17 history edited ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 255 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 15:05 history asked ravenspoint CC BY-SA 3.0