Skip to main content
edited title
Source Link
milancurcic
  • 5k
  • 1
  • 29
  • 41

Why is WRF most often configured at 3:1 nesting ratio?

In WRF application, nested domain has always been used for weather/air quality modeling for the place of interest in a better resolution.

  The figure below is an example to illustrate that.illustrates this:

enter image description here

I have noticed that the ratio of grid resolution between outer  (coarser) domain and inner  (finer) domain are always be set inat 3:1(In this case => 12:4) ratio.

Is there any reason in the aspects of physical process or computation?

  Is the ratio of 3:1 helpful for the interaction between the boundary?

I'm looking forward for your answers.

Why is WRF most often configured at 3:1 nesting ratio

In WRF application, nested domain has always been used for weather/air quality modeling for the place of interest in a better resolution.

  The figure below is an example to illustrate that.

enter image description here

I have noticed that the ratio of grid resolution between outer(coarser) domain and inner(finer) domain are always be set in 3:1(In this case => 12:4).

Is there any reason in the aspects of physical process or computation?

  Is the ratio of 3:1 helpful for the interaction between the boundary?

I'm looking forward for your answers.

Why is WRF most often configured at 3:1 nesting ratio?

In WRF application, nested domain has always been used for weather/air quality modeling for the place of interest in a better resolution. The figure below illustrates this:

enter image description here

I have noticed that the ratio of grid resolution between outer  (coarser) domain and inner  (finer) domain are always set at 3:1 ratio.

Is there any reason in the aspects of physical process or computation? Is the ratio of 3:1 helpful for the interaction between the boundary?

edited tags; edited title
Link
milancurcic
  • 5k
  • 1
  • 29
  • 41

Why is WRF always be setmost often configured at 3:1 nesting ratio

Source Link
Han Zhengzu
  • 2.5k
  • 1
  • 13
  • 25

Why WRF always be set at 3:1 nesting ratio

In WRF application, nested domain has always been used for weather/air quality modeling for the place of interest in a better resolution.

The figure below is an example to illustrate that.

enter image description here

I have noticed that the ratio of grid resolution between outer(coarser) domain and inner(finer) domain are always be set in 3:1(In this case => 12:4).

Is there any reason in the aspects of physical process or computation?

Is the ratio of 3:1 helpful for the interaction between the boundary?

I'm looking forward for your answers.