5
$\begingroup$

I would love to know what exactly we can do with the extracted wavelet. What kind of information extracted wavelet can contain?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hello Fearless, welcome to the site. I think it may be good to explain a bit/link about what a wavelet extraction is/what directed you to use it, as that could help/draw interest to a wider audience. As is, with Earth Science being pretty diverse subtopics, even many earth scientists may not know much about what you're talking about. :-) $\endgroup$ Aug 22, 2022 at 21:32

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

We're usually not interested in the wavelet per se, but we need to know it in order to understand how the seismic trace relates to geological properties we are interested in.

According to the so-called convolutional model of seismic, a trace $s(t)$ (the amplitude is a function of time $t$) has three main components, so to speak:

$$ s(t) = r(t) \ast w(t) + n $$

where $r$ is the reflectivity of the earth, $w$ is the wavelet, $n$ is random noise, and $\ast$ denotes a mathematical operation called convolution.

The reflectivity of the earth is very useful geological information. Reflectivity is a function of the impedance contrast at a boundary (e.g. between two beds) and impedance is, in turn, a function of important rock properties, especially density and the speed of sound in the rock. Both of these properties can help us deduce the rock type, porosity, fluid type, and so on, and other related properties can tell us about thin beds and fractures and other interesting things.

The problem with getting at the rock property information from the seismic trace is that it's all tangled up with the wavelet via the convolutional operator (there's noise too, but we can't do much about that.)

So why do we need the wavelet?

Two reasons:

  • Forward modeling. With a wavelet, we can try to forward model the seismic. For example we can measure, or guess, the impedance, calculate the reflectivity, and convolve with a wavelet to have a good guess at what the seismic might look like. This will result in synthetic seismic. We can use this to, for example, try to figure out which bed in a borehole is which event in a seismic volume (we call this process 'well tying'.)
  • Inversion. Or, we can use the wavelet to get at the geology from the seismic data we measured. If we can estimate the wavelet, we can try to untangle it, or deconvolve it, from the seismic trace and get at the juicy geological stuff.

So, having the wavelet, or being able to make a good guess at it, is useful. There are several ways to do it, e.g. see the SEG wiki. But it's a bit of an art and can be frustrating to get right... so a lot of people give up and use a standard off-the-shelf wavelet like a Ricker.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Hello sir, how to calculate scale of a ricker wavelet (obtained with bruges.filter.ricker) ? Sorry for asking the question here , I just didn't find a way to reach you :( . $\endgroup$ Oct 30, 2022 at 17:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Fearless_Wolf Not sure what you mean by 'scale'. But feel free to make an issue on the repo: github.com/agilescientific/bruges $\endgroup$
    – Matt Hall
    Oct 30, 2022 at 22:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.