3
$\begingroup$

Recently I found this tutorial video about Jet streaks (want to mention I'm only in second term so my knowledge is not advanced yet). Originally I was looking for the topic because of a particular exercise I have to solve but now I got stuck here:

enter image description here

Mathematically it is clear for me that ageostrophic wind calculates according to

$$\vec v_{ag} = \frac{1}{f} \cdot \vec k \times \frac{d \vec v}{d t}$$

But now my problem:

It is assumed that the real wind flows in x direction from W to (blue) E. Therefore, the ageostrophic wind is oriented towards north direction (green arrow). But, vectorially, this means that the geostrophic wind (red) must be directed a little to south so that read + green = blue.

But isn't that in contradiction to the fact, that geostrophic wind is always oriented along contours of constant height? Especially in this image, the contour through the point of interest is the straight line from W to E and not oriented towards south.

Moreover, its is shown in the video that the regions of convergence/divergence are N/S to the entrance and the opposite at the exit.

I would have guessed, that region of divergence is on the entrance and convergence at the exit, because

$$\vec \nabla \cdot \vec v = \partial u/\partial x + \partial v/\partial y$$

Since in the picture $v=0$ everywhere, we would have

$$\vec \nabla \cdot \vec v = \partial u/\partial x $$

and this depends only on the zonal position, not on meridional.

Do I maybe need to consider also w along z to calculate divergence? But we have been told, that vertical motion is neglectable.

Something is weird here...what is wrong in my understanding?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I cannot follow, what your hint shall be. I know what natural coordinates are. How does this relate to my question? $\endgroup$
    – MichaelW
    Commented Mar 12, 2023 at 14:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Don't have time for a full answer right now, but noticed up front... yes geodtrophic is parallel to height contours. But ageostrophic means non-geostrophic, so you're adding the geo and non geo $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 12, 2023 at 15:47
  • $\begingroup$ My main problem is that the real wind shown has only a zonal component and therefore gives divergence on the left and convergence on the right. I can't see what could be wrong with that. However, divergence and convergence zones are as indicated in the video and differ in the north and south. $\endgroup$
    – MichaelW
    Commented Mar 12, 2023 at 18:01

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.